Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 

[Valid RSS] RSS

Database - Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR)

Description of this database

http://afar.info/id=1105

Created on : 31 Mar 2005
Modified on : 02 Dec 2007


 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!

hard

Author(s) :

Fullerton JT, Hollenbach KA, Wingard DL.

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Practice styles. A comparison of obstetricians and nurse-midwives.
J Nurse Midwifery. 1996 May-Jun;41(3):243-50.

Year of publication :

1996

Résumé (français) :

Abstract (English):

Iain Chalmers and the National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Oxford, England, developed a comprehensive listing of perinatal care procedures shown to reduce the frequency of adverse outcomes during pregnancy and childbirth. This list was used as a framework for a pilot study conducted in 1992 that reviewed similarities and differences in opinion and practice style between certified nurse-midwives (CNMs) and obstetrician/gynecologists. Twenty CNMs and 57 obstetrician/gynecologists who were active clinical practitioners in San Diego commented on 24 items drawn from Chalmers’ work. The CNMs were more likely to favor the availability of social and psychological support variables and to use them in their practice. The groups were more alike than different in their views concerning preventive interventions during the prenatal period. CNMs were more likely to support the availability of alternatives to maternal positions for labor and birth, exhalatory breathing, and delayed pushing and less likely to support the availability of electronic fetal monitoring, epidural anesthesia, episiotomy, and active management of the third stage. A small sample size and limited response rate restricted interpretation and generalizability of these data. Nevertheless the data offer support for other studies with similar findings. They also suggest that health system administrators should inform women and families about differences in practice styles before families select from among the various insurance options that may, in the end, restrict the choice of provider or birth setting.

Sumário (português):

URL :

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=…

Comments :

Argument (français) :

Les différences de pratique entre les sages-femmes et les obstétriciens.

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Keywords :

attendance ; deontology ; episiotomy ; epidural ; position during labor ; guidelines ; psychology ; active management of labor ; physiology ; duration of labour ; ethics

Author of this record :

Cécile_Loup — 31 Mar 2005


DateDiscussion (only in English)Author
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms (read guidelines)

New expert query ---  New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database

bar

This database is managed by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR, http://afar.info)
affiliated with Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, http://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) becoming a member of AFAR
(2) financially supporting AFAR
(3) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in scientific documentation.
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact afar.association(arobase)gmail.com for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!