Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 

[Valid RSS] RSS

Database - Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR)

http://afar.info/id=1370
Created on : 4/01/2006
Modified on : 02/01/2018

Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!

easy

Author(s) :

Steven L. Bloom MD, Brian M. Casey MD, Joseph I. Schaffer MD, Donald D. McIntire PhD and Kenneth J. Leveno MD

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

A randomized trial of coached versus uncoached maternal pushing during the second stage of labor. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 194, Issue 1, January, Pages 10-13

Year of publication :

2006

Résumé (français) :

Abstract (English):

(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX)

Objective

The objective of this study was to compare obstetrical outcomes associated with coached versus uncoached pushing during the second stage of labor.

Study design

Upon reaching the second stage, previously consented nulliparous women with uncomplicated labors and without epidural analgesia were randomly assigned to coached (n = 163) versus uncoached (n = 157) pushing. Women allocated to coaching received standardized closed glottis pushing instructions by certified nurse-midwives with proper ventilation encouraged between contractions. These midwives also attended those women assigned to no coaching to ensure that any expulsive efforts were involuntary.

Results

The second stage of labor was abbreviated by approximately 13 minutes in coached women ( P= .01). There were no other clinically significant immediate maternal or neonatal outcomes between the 2 groups.

Conclusion

Although associated with a slightly shorter second stage, coached maternal pushing confers no other advantages and withholding such coaching is not harmful.

Key words: Coached pushing; Uncoached pushing; Second-stage labor management

Sumário (português):

URL :

http://www.cmnh.ca/papers/pushing.pdf

Full text (private) :

http://afar.info/private/1370

Comments :

Argument (français) :

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Keywords :

duration of labour ; active management of labor ; incontinence/prolapsus

Author of this record :

Bernard_Bel — 4/01/2006


DateDiscussion (only in English)Author
 
➡ Only identified users


 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms (read guidelines)

New expert query ---  New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database

bar

This database is managed by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR, http://afar.info)
affiliated with Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, http://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) becoming a member of AFAR
(2) financially supporting AFAR
(3) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in scientific documentation.
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact afar.association(arobase)gmail.com for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!