Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 

[Valid RSS] RSS

Database - Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR)

http://afar.info/id=1912
Created on : 28/03/2006
Modified on : 2/12/2007

Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!

hard

Author(s) :

Sciscione AC, Nguyen L, Manley J, Pollock M, Maas B, Colmorgen G.

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

A randomized comparison of transcervical Foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening. {USA}. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Apr;97(4):603-7.

Year of publication :

2001

Résumé (français) :

Abstract (English):

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol tablets with transcervical Foley catheter for preinduction cervical ripening.

METHODS: Pregnant women who presented for induction of labor with unfavorable cervices (Bishop score less than 6) were assigned randomly to intravaginal misoprostol (50 microg tablet every 4 hours for a maximum of six doses) or 30-mL Foley catheter placed transcervically with maintenance of traction.

RESULTS: Among 111 women, 53 were allocated to misoprostol and 58 to Foley bulb. Contractile abnormalities were more frequent in the misoprostol group (20.4%) than the Foley group (0%) (P <.001). No statistically significant differences were noted between groups in change in Bishop score, preinduction cervical ripening times, and total induction times. There were no statistically significant differences in mode of delivery or adverse neonatal outcomes. Uterine rupture occurred in one woman with two previous cesarean deliveries in the misoprostol group.

CONCLUSION: Intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical Foley catheter are equivalent for cervical ripening. Uterine contractile abnormalities and meconium passage are more common with misoprostol.

Sumário (português):

URL :

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=1127503

Comments :

Argument (français) :


Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Keywords :

vaginal birth after caesarean ; induction of labor ; fetal distress ; evidence-based medicine/midwifery ; misoprostol (Cytotec) ; post-term pregnancy ; c-section/caesarean

Author of this record :

Cécile_Loup — 28/03/2006


DateDiscussion (only in English)Author
 
➡ Only identified users


 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms (read guidelines)

New expert query ---  New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database

bar

This database is managed by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR, http://afar.info)
affiliated with Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, http://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) becoming a member of AFAR
(2) financially supporting AFAR
(3) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in scientific documentation.
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact afar.association(arobase)gmail.com for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!