Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 

[Valid RSS] RSS

Database - Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR)

Description of this database

http://afar.info/id=278

Created on : 18 Dec 2003
Modified on : 01 Dec 2007


 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!

easy

Author(s) :

Wass V, Richards T, Cantillon P.

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Monitoring the medical education revolution. Editorial. The British Medical Journal. 2003;327:1362.

Year of publication :

2003

Résumé (français) :

Abstract (English):

The impact of new training programmes must be evaluated

This is a time of great change in both undergraduate and postgraduate medical education. The General Medical Council’s recommendations for Tomorrow’s Doctors1 have stimulated educational innovations and new curriculums in all British medical schools. Key changes include early patient contact from the beginning of the course; more emphasis on patient centred communication skills; an increased focus on ethics, culture, and ethnicity; and more training in the community. Different approaches to teaching are being introduced, such as special study modules to stimulate self directed learning,1 problem based learning as a method of integrating different strands of the curriculum,2 and shorter courses for graduates.3

At the same time postgraduate education is undergoing profound changes, with the "modernisation" of specialist training.4 The establishment of the Postgraduate Medical Education Training Board (PMETB, www.doh.gov.uk/medicaltrainingintheuk/pmetbord.htm), to set and maintain standards across all UK postgraduate medical training, will undoubtedly affect current practice. Moreover, with the introduction of appraisal and revalidation,5 the concepts of life long learning, portfolio careers, and accreditation for continuing medical education are here to stay.

Many of the educational initiatives that have been introduced both in and outside the UK seem logical, but educational policy is not necessarily being informed by evidence. Research in medical education is of value,6 but it is often ignored.7 Where is the clear evidence of effectiveness to argue for these changes?

The establishment of the Best Evidence Medical Education initiative (BEME, www.bemecollaboration.org), an international collaboration of medical educationalists who gather evidence to support educational interventions and make recommendations for good practice, has been a welcome advance. In 1999 the BMJ issued guidelines for evaluating papers on educational interventions.8 Medical education journals, including Medical Education9 and Medical Teacher10 have also asked for greater rigour in educational research.

Early last year the BMJ started a new section called Learning in Practice.11 The section aims to break down barriers between educationalists and clinicians, facilitate understanding of challenges in medical education, and stimulate those involved in teaching to think critically about how they do it.

Interesting and innovative educational initiatives are undoubtedly abundant, and we would like to encourage more submissions for the Learning in Practice section.8 To help further understanding of medical education and the many changes that are taking place, we are introducing a new page entitled "What the educators are saying" (p 1393). This will highlight important and interesting publications from the medical education literature. The aim is to ensure both an international perspective and to cover undergraduate and postgraduate issues.

Medical education is in the midst of a revolution and the pace is unlikely to slacken. There is an urgent need to monitor this new international culture in medical education, learn from each other’s experiences, and establish evidence for best practice.

Sumário (português):

URL :

http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/327/74…

Comments :

Argument (français) :

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Keywords :

midwifery training ; history, sociology ; ethics

Author of this record :

Cécile_Loup — 18 Dec 2003


DateDiscussion (only in English)Author
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms (read guidelines)

New expert query ---  New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database

bar

This database is managed by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR, http://afar.info)
affiliated with Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, http://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) becoming a member of AFAR
(2) financially supporting AFAR
(3) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in scientific documentation.
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact afar.association(arobase)gmail.com for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!