Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 

[Valid RSS] RSS

Database - Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR)

http://afar.info/id=346
Created on : 8/01/2004
Modified on : 2/12/2007

Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!

easy

Author(s) :

Thorp JA, Breedlove G.

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Epidural analgesia in labor: an evaluation of risks and benefits. Review.
Birth. 1996 Jun;23(2):63-83.

Year of publication :

1996

Résumé (français) :

Abstract (English):

BACKGROUND: Intrapartum epidural analgesia has become increasingly popular because it is the most effective method of providing pain relief during labor. Much attention is given to its safety and efficacy, and many health care providers and consumers are unaware of its potential drawbacks. This article reviews the literature about the effects of epidural analgesia on the mother and infant.

METHODS: We performed a computer-assisted MEDLINE search for articles and a review of bibliographies from articles on epidural analgesia. When reported data were incomplete, authors were contacted for more detailed information.

RESULTS: The most common procedure-related complications, hypotension, inadvertent dural puncture, and headache, are easily treated and usually self-limited. Permanent morbidity and mortality are rare. Retrospective studies and randomized controlled trials both demonstrate that epidural analgesia is associated with increases in duration of labor, instrument vaginal delivery, and cesarean birth. To date only three trials randomized patients to narcotic versus epidural groups, and all showed a twofold to threefold increase in cesarean section for dystocia. Limiting epidural use in nulliparous labor and delaying its placement until after 5 cm of cervical dilation may reduce the risk of operative intervention for dystocia. Epidural analgesia may also increase intervention for fetal distress. Several studies show its association with maternal fever in labor. Its association with chronic back pain, neonatal behavioral changes, and maternal-infant bonding are more tenuous and require further study.

CONCLUSIONS: Epidural analgesia is a safe and effective method of relieving pain in labor, but is associated with longer labor, more operative intervention, and increases in cost. It must remain an option; however, caregivers and consumers should be aware of associated risks. Women should be counseled about these risks and other pain-relieving options before the duress of labor.

Sumário (português):

URL :

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8826170&dopt=Abstract

Comments :

Argument (français) :

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Keywords :

c-section/caesarean ; fetal distress ; dystocy ; instrumental delivery ; evidence-based medicine/midwifery ; pain medication ; epidural ; morbidity ; pain

Author of this record :

Cécile_Loup — 8/01/2004


DateDiscussion (only in English)Author
 
➡ Only identified users


 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms (read guidelines)

New expert query ---  New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database

bar

This database is managed by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR, http://afar.info)
affiliated with Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, http://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) becoming a member of AFAR
(2) financially supporting AFAR
(3) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in scientific documentation.
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact afar.association(arobase)gmail.com for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!