=> [Français]
=> [Português]

Database - Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR)

Record ID : 346
Created on : 8/01/2004
Modified on : 2/12/2007

Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know the admin password!

URL of this record : http://afar.info/id=346

=> easy

Author(s) :

Thorp JA, Breedlove G.

Year of publication :

1996

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Epidural analgesia in labor: an evaluation of risks and benefits. Review.
Birth. 1996 Jun;23(2):63-83.

Résumé (français) :

Abstract (English):

BACKGROUND: Intrapartum epidural analgesia has become increasingly popular because it is the most effective method of providing pain relief during labor. Much attention is given to its safety and efficacy, and many health care providers and consumers are unaware of its potential drawbacks. This article reviews the literature about the effects of epidural analgesia on the mother and infant.

METHODS: We performed a computer-assisted MEDLINE search for articles and a review of bibliographies from articles on epidural analgesia. When reported data were incomplete, authors were contacted for more detailed information.

RESULTS: The most common procedure-related complications, hypotension, inadvertent dural puncture, and headache, are easily treated and usually self-limited. Permanent morbidity and mortality are rare. Retrospective studies and randomized controlled trials both demonstrate that epidural analgesia is associated with increases in duration of labor, instrument vaginal delivery, and cesarean birth. To date only three trials randomized patients to narcotic versus epidural groups, and all showed a twofold to threefold increase in cesarean section for dystocia. Limiting epidural use in nulliparous labor and delaying its placement until after 5 cm of cervical dilation may reduce the risk of operative intervention for dystocia. Epidural analgesia may also increase intervention for fetal distress. Several studies show its association with maternal fever in labor. Its association with chronic back pain, neonatal behavioral changes, and maternal-infant bonding are more tenuous and require further study.

CONCLUSIONS: Epidural analgesia is a safe and effective method of relieving pain in labor, but is associated with longer labor, more operative intervention, and increases in cost. It must remain an option; however, caregivers and consumers should be aware of associated risks. Women should be counseled about these risks and other pain-relieving options before the duress of labor.

Sumário (português):

URL :

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8826170&dopt=Abstract

Comments :

Argument (français) :

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Keywords :

c-section/caesarean ; fetal distress ; dystocy ; instrumental delivery ; evidence-based medicine/midwifery ; pain medication ; epidural ; morbidity ; pain

Author of this record :

C. Loup

New expert query ---  New simple query

Creating new record

This database is managed by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR, http://afar.info)
affiliated with Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, http://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) becoming a member of AFAR
(2) financially supporting AFAR
(3) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in scientific documentation.