Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 

[Valid RSS] RSS

Database - Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR)

http://afar.info/id=681
Created on : 19/04/2004
Modified on : 2/12/2007

Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!

hard

Author(s) :

Mead M, Kornbrot D.

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

An intrapartum intervention scoring system for the comparison of maternity units' intrapartum care of nulliparous women suitable for midwifery-led care.
Midwifery 2004;20(1):15-26.

Year of publication :

2004

Résumé (français) :

Abstract (English):

Objective:

to develop an intrapartum intervention scoring tool which could be used to define maternity units as either `lower intrapartum intervention' or `higher intrapartum intervention' units. This scoring tool was designed to form the basis of a comparison of the perception of risk by midwives working in either `lower intrapartum intervention' or `higher intrapartum intervention' units.

Design:

three aspects were included: (1) the systematic data reduction of the St. Mary's Maternity Information System database used by 11 maternity units to include Caucasian nulliparous women suitable for midwifery-led care; (2) the calculation and the ranking of frequency distributions for the following interventions/management: (a) the management of breech presentation and of one previous caesarean section, the choice of home birth; and (b) augmentation of labour, use of electronic fetal monitoring, use of epidural, method of delivery; (3) the sum of the individual intrapartum ranking marks made up the final intrapartum score for each unit.

Results:

intrapartum interventions varied considerably between units. The scoring system enabled units to be described as either `Lower intrapartum intervention' or `Higher intrapartum intervention' units.

Conclusions:

routinely collected computerised data can be used to identify the outcomes of intrapartum care. This study suggests that the analysis of computerised data could provide a suitable basis for the audit and the comparison of intrapartum interventions for the care of women suitable for midwifery-led care.

Sumário (português):

URL :

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WN9-4BWC77H-2&_user=10&_handle=B-WA-A-A-A

Comments :

Texte en accès libre.

Argument (français) :

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Keywords :

homebirth ; c-section/caesarean ; monitoring ; epidural ; breech presentation ; active management of labor ; duration of labour ; place of birth ; dystocy

Author of this record :

Cécile_Loup — 19/04/2004 ➡ latest update : Bernard_Bel — 2/12/2007


DateDiscussion (only in English)Author
 
➡ Only identified users


 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms (read guidelines)

New expert query ---  New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database

bar

This database is managed by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR, http://afar.info)
affiliated with Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, http://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) becoming a member of AFAR
(2) financially supporting AFAR
(3) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in scientific documentation.
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact afar.association(arobase)gmail.com for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!