Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 
 Español 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Database - (CIANE)

Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website)
Currently 3108 records
YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=681

Created on : 19 Apr 2004
Modified on : 02 Dec 2007

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!


Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Hard

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

An intrapartum intervention scoring system for the comparison of maternity units’ intrapartum care of nulliparous women suitable for midwifery-led care. Midwifery 2004;20(1):15-26.

Author(s) :

Mead M, Kornbrot D.

Year of publication :

2004

URL(s) :

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleUR…

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

Objective:

to develop an intrapartum intervention scoring tool which could be used to define maternity units as either `lower intrapartum intervention’ or `higher intrapartum intervention’ units. This scoring tool was designed to form the basis of a comparison of the perception of risk by midwives working in either `lower intrapartum intervention’ or `higher intrapartum intervention’ units.

Design:

three aspects were included: (1) the systematic data reduction of the St. Mary’s Maternity Information System database used by 11 maternity units to include Caucasian nulliparous women suitable for midwifery-led care; (2) the calculation and the ranking of frequency distributions for the following interventions/management: (a) the management of breech presentation and of one previous caesarean section, the choice of home birth; and (b) augmentation of labour, use of electronic fetal monitoring, use of epidural, method of delivery; (3) the sum of the individual intrapartum ranking marks made up the final intrapartum score for each unit.

Results:

intrapartum interventions varied considerably between units. The scoring system enabled units to be described as either `Lower intrapartum intervention’ or `Higher intrapartum intervention’ units.

Conclusions:

routinely collected computerised data can be used to identify the outcomes of intrapartum care. This study suggests that the analysis of computerised data could provide a suitable basis for the audit and the comparison of intrapartum interventions for the care of women suitable for midwifery-led care.

Sumário (português)  :

Resumen (español)  :

Comments :

Texte en accès libre.

Argument (français) :

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Argumento (español):

Keywords :

➡ c-section/caesarean ; duration of labour ; place of birth ; homebirth ; monitoring ; epidural ; active management of labor ; breech presentation ; dystocy

Author of this record :

Cécile Loup — 19 Apr 2004
➡ latest update : Bernard Bel — 02 Dec 2007

Discussion (display only in English)
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms (read guidelines)

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth